Today, I’m going to say the words that often make people cringe in the world of process improvement:
Time and motion.
Yeah, I know, I can practically feel the collective sigh. Those words conjure up images of old-school industrial engineers with clipboards, making everyone feel nervous and scrutinised. And let’s not forget the infamous Hawthorne effect, where people act differently just because they know they’re being watched.
But here’s the thing, it doesn’t have to be like that.
The hard truth is, if you want to understand and improve any process that involves human beings, you need to know how it’s currently working and what optimum looks like. That’s where timing comes in.
It’s not about being a Big Brother figure. It’s about data-driven decision making.
Lean Six Sigma isn’t just about reducing waste ,it’s about optimising value flow. And to do that, we need accurate data on cycle times, takt times, and throughput.
But the methodology matters.
There are many ways to time a process, and the right approach depends on your specific environment and goal.
But the absolute key is the soft stuff.
Lean Six Sigma is about people, not just processes. To successfully implement any time study, you need:
Now, I know what you’re thinking: “But Gavin, won’t this just lead to staff reductions?”
This is a common fear, but in my experience as a Master Black Belt, it’s rarely the case. The goal isn’t to cut jobs, it’s to:
So, let’s leave the white coats at home.
Let’s embrace time studies as a valuable tool for understanding and improving our processes, but let’s do it with respect, transparency, and a focus on empowering the key people.